The Next Phase of Crypto Liquidity: Institutions and AMM Will Coexist

As crypto markets move deeper into institutional maturity, one reality is becoming increasingly clear:
the future of liquidity will not be dominated by a single model.

Instead, the market is converging toward a dual-liquidity structure, where:

  • Large institutional market makers and HFT firms remain the backbone of core liquidity, and
  • Centralized AMM liquidity, powered by LPs, enters a phase of explosive growth.

This is not a contradiction — it is a natural evolution.


Institutional Market Makers: Still Irreplaceable

Large market makers and HFT firms will continue to play a structural role in crypto markets.

Their advantages remain unmatched:

  • Ultra-tight spreads on core pairs
  • Inventory management across venues
  • Cross-market arbitrage and risk recycling
  • Stability during periods of high volatility

For high-volume spot and derivatives markets, professional MMs remain essential.
They anchor price discovery, absorb directional flow, and ensure continuity during stress events.

In this sense, crypto is following the same path as FX and equities:
institutions do not disappear — they become infrastructure.


Why Centralized AMM Liquidity Is About to Explode

At the same time, a second force is accelerating rapidly.

Centralized AMM models unlock something institutions cannot scale infinitely:
distributed, long-tail liquidity from LPs.

Several factors make this growth inevitable:

  1. Lower Barriers to Participation
    LPs no longer need trading desks, quant teams, or ultra-low latency infrastructure. Capital can be productive without becoming directional.
  2. Capital Efficiency for Idle Assets
    As users seek yield beyond passive holding, AMM-style liquidity provision becomes a natural destination for dormant capital.
  3. Risk Segmentation
    AMMs allow exchanges to route different risk profiles into different liquidity pools — separating speculative trading from yield-seeking capital.
  4. Scalability Through Numbers, Not Speed
    Unlike HFT, AMM liquidity scales with participation, not microseconds.

As more users understand these dynamics, LP participation is set to grow exponentially, especially in centralized environments where UX, risk controls, and transparency are improved.


The Emerging Hybrid Market Structure

What we are witnessing is not competition, but specialization.

  • Market makers dominate:
    • Core pairs
    • High-frequency execution
    • Price formation
  • AMM LPs dominate:
    • Long-tail assets
    • Yield-oriented liquidity
    • Passive capital deployment

This hybrid structure allows exchanges to:

  • Reduce reliance on a single liquidity source
  • Improve resilience across market cycles
  • Offer multiple participation paths for capital

Platforms like BitGW are positioning themselves for this reality — where institutional precision and distributed liquidity coexist inside one ecosystem.


Why This Trend Is Inevitable

Every mature financial market eventually reaches the same conclusion:

Not all capital wants speed.
Not all capital wants risk.
But all capital wants efficiency.

Crypto is no different.

As the market expands, liquidity will no longer be defined by who is fastest, but by who is best matched to each role. Institutions will continue to set the floor. LP-driven AMMs will raise the ceiling.

Together, they form the foundation of the next-generation crypto market.

About the Author

You may also like these